Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Environment & Development
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1070496507312598v1
17/2/166    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The Politics of Defining Participatory Forestry: A Case From Democratizing Indonesia

Ko Nomura, Ph.D*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: konomura{at}rikkyo.ac.jp.


   Abstract
Embracing the opportunities provided by democratization and decentralization, the Wonosobo district, Central Java, enacted a local regulation on participatory forestry. The regulation, which entailed significant participation of civil society groups, was largely influenced by the idea of emphasizing the people’s rights of political participation. However, this faced a backlash from the remaining representatives of the old authoritarian state, who demanded a state-created participatory forestry scheme. The scheme was shaped by the utilitarian idea emphasizing economic and ecological consequences of participation in an instrumentalist manner. Because of legal uncertainty and conventional political culture persisting at the local and national levels, state actors were able to produce outcomes contrary to the local regulation. This article illustrates the importance of recognizing the distinction between the key ideas with respect to "participation" to understand the political struggles concerning the decentralization of forest management.

First published on February 22, 2008, doi:10.1177/1070496507312598

The Journal of Environment & Development 2008;17:166.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?