Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Environment & Development
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarze, R.
Right arrow Articles by Niles, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Long-Term Requirement for Clean Development Mechanism Forestry and Economic Liability

Reimund Schwarze

University of Technology, Berlin

John O. Niles

Stanford University's Center for Conservation Biology

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol allows developed countries to gain greenhouse gas emission reduction credits by sponsoring projects in developing countries. The CDM requires such credits to be granted only to projects that produce long-term benefits to climate change. However, countries that host CDM projects may be reluctant to engage in long-term projects for fear of sacrificing national sovereignty, a concern particularly acute in land-use efforts such as forest conservation. One solution is to use economic liability in CDM contracts, delaying payments to parties to encourage long-term contracting. We evaluate CDM-sponsored forest conservation using several types of economic liability schemes. We find that seller liability has intrinsic advantages over other types of liability contracts. We then propose a modified seller liability contract for CDM forestry that is more profitable to host countries than is pure seller liability, while still providing sufficient long-term incentives.

The Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 9, No. 4, 384-404 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/107049650000900404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?