Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Environment & Development
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1070496508319862v1
17/3/215    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conca, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The United States and International Water Policy

Ken Conca

University of Maryland

This article examines the role of the United States in international institutions and practices for governing water. Water is a critical global challenge of environmental protection and human security. Water is also characteristic of a set of "translocal" environmental issues for which international institution building has emerged along several different fronts: development assistance initiatives, efforts to manage ongoing controversies over water privatization and large dams, the campaign to recognize water as a human right, and a framework convention on cooperation in internationally shared river basins. U.S. engagement across these initiatives reveals several patterns: the fragmented nature of U.S. policies on water, a systematic tilt toward framing water as a market commodity rather than as a human right, the late arrival of U.S. nongovernmental organizations to several important domains of global water politics, and some notable gaps between U.S. policies, at home and abroad, and evolving international concepts of best practice.

Key Words: United States • water • foreign policy • governance • institution building • development assistance • transboundary rivers • dams • privatization

This version was published on September 1, 2008

The Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 17, No. 3, 215-237 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1070496508319862


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?