This Article Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Aldy, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Environmental Kuznets Curve Analysis of U.S. State-Level Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Harvard University, aldy{at}fas.harvard.edu

Most environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theories do not apply to carbon dioxide (CO₂)—an unregulated, invisible, odorless gas with no direct human health effects. This analysis addresses the hypothesis that the income-CO₂ relationship reflects changes in the composition of an economy as it develops and the associated role of trade in an emissions-intensive good (e.g., electricity). To test this hypothesis, I use a novel data set of 1960 to 1999 state-level CO₂ emissions to estimate pretrade (production-based) CO₂ EKCs and posttrade (consumption-based) CO₂ EKCs. Based on the first EKC analysis of CO₂ emissions in the United States, I find that consumption-based EKCs peak at significantly higher incomes than production-based EKCs, suggesting that emissions-intensive trade drives, at least in part, the income-emissions relationship. I have also investigated the robustness of the estimated income-CO₂relationship through a variety of specifications. Estimated EKCs appear to vary by state, and the estimated income-emissions relationships could be spurious for some states with nonstationary income and emissions data. Finally, I find that cold winters, warm summers, and historic coal endowments are positively associated with states’ CO₂ emissions.

Key Words: environmental Kuznets curve • greenhouse gas emissions • electricity trade • cubic spline

The Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 14, No. 1, 48-72 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1070496504273514


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?